Skip to content

Markets · Correlation

The 45-degree line is a 60/40 that did no work

X is Damodaran’s S&P calendar return. Y is 60% that S&P and 40% his 10-year. The dashed line is Y = X: the mix is the stock. 2008 sits far above it. 2022 sits on it.

MarketsUpdated 2026-09-047 min read
-30-20-1001020-40-2002019311937196919731974200020022008202020222025
2022 60/40 vs 100% S&P
0.08 pt
2008 mix versus the S&P
+22.7 pt
2008 60/40, the better mix
−13.9%
2022 60/40, the stock
−18.0%

A mix that sits on Y = X is not a mix

The dashed line is the product you thought you did not own: 100% equities, wearing a 40% costume. 2022 is on it. Damodaran’s 60/40 of S&P and 10-year Treasuries printed −18.0%. The S&P printed −18.04%. Four hundredths of a point is not diversification. It is a rounding error. 2008 is the other geometry. Equities −36.6%, mix −13.9%. The 40% returned +20.1% and lifted the year by 23 points. That is the picture in every 60/40 brochure. It is also the picture 2022 retired.

Size is the job the 40% did

The disc is |60/40 − S&P|. Large means the Treasury sleeve changed the year. 2008 is the largest on this wall. 2002 and 1931 are the next. 2022 is almost invisible, which is the point — not a charting failure. 2000 is the quiet win: stocks −9%, mix +1.2%. 1973–74 are medium discs because bonds were barely up; gold, on the other wall, did the work. Marquette’s live-style S&P/Agg mix is −16.1% in calendar 2022, still in the neighbourhood of 1937, still worse than 2008. We do not promote it onto these axes. Same two series, every year.

The long view is a line you can fail

Own a 40% that can leave the dashed line. Cash and short quality duration are how 2022 would have left it. Long Treasuries are how 2008 did. What would change this page: a Damodaran year in which the mix again prints 20 points better than the S&P while the S&P is down double-digits. Until then 2022 is the occupant of the line.

Investing lens

Horizon Full cycle · Educational, not advice

Stress-test the mix at Y = X, not at 2008. If the 40% cannot leave the dashed line in an inflation shock, it is the same bet as the 60%.

Where the map points

  • A barbell 40%: cash for 2022, a smaller long-duration sleeve for 2008
  • Rebalance rules that still fire when both legs are red
  • Do not treat a 60/40 tracking error of 0.08 points as a hedge
  • Gold as 1974 insurance, outside the mix on this wall

What can break it

  • A 2008-shaped year that makes the cash sleeve look timid
  • A 2022-shaped year that makes the long bond look late
  • Mixing Marquette −16.1% or Morningstar −25.1% onto this scatter

CHART does not recommend securities, funds or trades. Figures can be revised by their publishers. Do your own research and consider regulated advice before allocating capital.

Sources

Every headline number traces to a named publisher. Contextual sources inform the essay, not the key stat.

  1. 01PrimaryAswath Damodaran, NYU Stern2026-01
    Historical Returns on Stocks, Bonds and Bills: 1928–2025

    Calendar total returns. 2022: S&P −18.04%, 10-year Treasuries −17.83%, T-bills +2.09%, Baa −15.23%, gold +0.55%, real estate +5.65%. 2008: S&P −36.55%, 10-year +20.10%, gold +4.32%. 2025: S&P +17.78%, 10-year +7.80%, gold +66.22%.

  2. 02PrimaryMarquette Associates2023-02
    The 60/40 Portfolio Revisited: Back from the Dead?

    Calendar 2022: S&P −18.1%, Bloomberg US Agg −13.1%, 60/40 −16.1%. Full-year average stock–bond correlation +0.15 vs long-term −0.24. 90-day window a 20-year high.

  3. 03ContextualMorningstar2025
    The 60/40 Portfolio: A 150-Year Markets Stress Test

    Their 60/40 declined 25.1% in 2022 and recouped the prior high in June 2025. Different construction from the Damodaran splice and from Marquette’s S&P/Agg mix — not plotted on the same bar.

  4. 04CorroboratedAlpha Architect2023-09-08
    Implications of Regime-Shifting Stock-Bond Correlation

    2022: S&P −18.1% and 20-year Treasuries −26.1% produced a 20.3% 60/40 loss, second-worst after 1937 (−21%). Average corr. +0.35 (1970–1999), −0.31 (2000–2022).

101 graphics in this issue